NevadaLIFE  Nevada Life Issues Forum and Education
Educating Nevadans on Life Issues...

 



Quick Links

Terri Schiavo Website

Nevada LIFE Euthanasia Page

   

Press Release

 

 

Terri Schiavo Polls And Reporting Mislead Public

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 25, 2005

The Following Statement Can Be Attributed To Nevada LIFE President 

Don Nelson

New polls show that Americans overwhelmingly reject saving Terri Schiavo’s life.  At least they reject saving her when presented with the media assumptions about the case.  The preambles to these polls, along with the steady drumbeat of media reporting, tell the public that Terri is in a persistent vegetative state or brain dead, has no chance of recovery and, is being kept alive by extreme life support measures against her will.  The Media Research Center examined network news stories from March 17-21.  Not one questioned Mike Schiavo’s credibility or put on a dissenting doctor.  When those assumptions are presented as true, it’s no wonder the public believes her life should be ended.

But these points are all hotly disputed and the results would be far different if these facts were told.  

1. Michael Schiavo’s credibility is suspicious.  Mike Schiavo has two children with a common law wife he’s lived with for ten years.  Terri did not leave any written indication that she would not want to be fed by a feeding tube.  Mike Schiavo remembered Terri’s words that she would not to live after he pleaded for millions of dollars in a malpractice lawsuit to be able care for her the rest of her life.  No one but Schiavo and his brother remember this. Terri’s friends and family swear she’d never say this.  We would not accept hearsay evidence against an accused murderer from anyone who stood to gain from his or her demise.  Mike Schiavo stopped all therapy for Terri after winning that award and was allowed by Judge Greer to use those funds for her therapy in legal fees to end her life.

2. Terri’s Reported Condition Is Flatly Contradicted By Expert Doctors. Neurologist Robert Cranford, who calls himself Dr. Death and believes that Alzheimer’s patients should have no constitutional rights, examined Terri for 45 minutes and was the chief witness the court relied upon to decide Terri is PVS.  45 minutes is not long enough to judge PVS and 43 percent of those diagnoses are incorrect.  Cranford’s work has also been called into question by his peers.  His testimony is flatly contradicted by Nobel Prize for Medicine nominee neurologist William Hammesfar who examined Terri for 10 hours and said she is not PVS, responds to her environment, obeys commands and could be helped tremendously by therapy including feeding herself.  33 other doctors have signed affidavits that she is not PVS and would benefit from therapy. 

3. Terri’s Was Not Dying, Sick, Or In A Coma.  She Breathes On Her Own And Is Not On Extreme Live Support Systems.  Terri’s “extreme measures” are a feeding tube.  That’s it.  Medical experts have signed affidavits saying that the denial of therapy and rehabilitation to Terri is abusive. 

The American people are the most caring people in history and reject disposing of those who are unable to speak for themselves. When these facts make their way into the public, they will not support the killing of a disabled woman by a man who is in no way qualified to act for her best interests.

 ###

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2002 NevadaLIFE ~ A not-for-profit organization
PO Box 50786 Sparks, NV 89435-0786  contact@nevadalife.org  (775) 530-0029  626-1024 (fax)